Health Promotion
Kaipara Care Incorporated Health Promotion Proposal
May 2003
Te Kopuru – A Health Promoting Community 1. Profile Linking Te Kopuru With The Wider Northern Wairoa District.
Te Kopuru is situated 12 km from Dargaville on the Pouto Peninsula.
In its ‘hay day' Te Kopuru was the main centre for the Northern
Wairoa. The surrounding area is rolling farm land, dairying predominates
with beef and sheep and forestry further down the peninsula.
Dargaville has a population of some 5,000 but services the surrounding
area which has an overall population of some 15,000. Within Northern
Wairoa, there are primary Schools and both Dargaville and Ruawai
have secondary schools. The shopping centre is good with a wide selection
of shops.
Te Kopuru has the Southern Rugby and Squash Club, a bowling Club
and there are numerous clubs in and around Dargaville, including
a Golf Club.
There are two marae, Oturei and Ripia.
Approximately 5 km to the west of Te Kopuru is the Coast with broad
stretches of sand where it is possible to travel for many miles
along the beach. Surfing, surfcasting, shellfish gathering and
netting are common. There are baches and picnic spots at Clarkes
Bay and Kellys Bay which are on the Kaipara Harbour and provide
safe bathing, fishing and sailing. The beautiful Kai Iwi lakes
are about three quarters of an hours drive northwards and are excellent
for sailing (good yacht club),
swimming, water skiing, picnicking and tramping. A little further
northwards is the Waipoua Forest, famous for the great Kauri. Whangarei,
on the east coast is about an hours drive, with the Bay of Islands
only two hours from here.
The community is kind, caring and friendly and there are ample opportunities
to become involved with the many clubs.
2. Te Kopuru Population and Deprivation Data
Te Kopuru stands out from all other towns in the Kaipara because
of its population mix. It has the highest proportion of Maori of
all towns in the Kaipara, and almost every street in Te Kopuru is
Quintile 5 (Decile 9 & 10) or the most highly deprived. Of KCI’s
enrolled population who are also known to be Quintile 5, Te Kopuru
makes up 21%. The KCI register is almost 60% complete in geocodable
addresses. This means that the known deprivation level of Te Kopuru
will rise as the register becomes more complete. The high level of
deprivation and the well known health inequalities of Maori, along
with a geographically defined town, make Te Kopuru the leading focus
for our health promotion project.
3. Initial Approach
An approach was received from senior men’s grade rugby coach,
Allen Dennis, who felt that more could be done to encourage his team
members, their families, and other grade teams at the (Te Kopuru)
Southern Rugby Club to adopt healthier lifestyles, from their food
and recreational choices, their health and safety on and off the
field, their choices to smoke or be smoke-free, and their general
levels of fitness. This approach led to an initial proposal framed
for the KCI board to consider further, which focused on the Southern
Rugby Club – The Health Promoting Rugby Club. The KCI board
agreed that the concept had promise, and that a Te Kopuru base for
early health promotion activity was well justified. The board nominated
a Health Promotion sub-committee to develop this proposal further.
4. The KCI Health Promotion Sub-Committee
This sub-committee is made up of 3 KCI Board members, KCI Project
Manager, Te Ha Health Promotion Co-ordinator, Health Promoting Schools
Regional Co-ordinator (Public Health Promotion, Northland DHB), Public
Health Nurse (Northland DHB). It met on three occasions. In establishing
priorities and developing this proposal it became clear that the
committee’s establishment, and ongoing activities were essential
to the success of the Te Kopuru and any other health promotion projects
which would be supported, implemented, evaluated and reviewed. It
is the committee’s view that a stable group of members with
governance and health promotion expertise should meet regularly (quarterly
once projects are established) to oversee their development. The
committee can make recommendations on expenditure to the full KCI
board, and present progress reports as required. Choosing Te Kopuru
as an initial focus should be viewed as strategically justifiable.
Lessons learned here about consultation, leadership choices, successes
and failures would be important when applying these principles to
other projects.
5. Goal Statement
KCI Health Promotion Sub-Committee, developed this Health Promoting
Community approach targeting a ‘health action group’ from
two initial behaviour change proposals (a) a health promoting rugby
club; (b) smoking cessation; and statistical data highlighting Te
Kopuru as a high deprivation area (as outlined above), tabled at
their first meeting.
The committee recognised the need to investigate what health promotion
activities were already taking place in Te Kopuru and support a plan
that fostered collaboration, cooperation and coordination
with the aim to develop planned activities that would build on what
was already happening, linking agencies and projects in this community.
The following goal statement was developed to assist us to adhere
to proven health promotion principles:
“To develop a model that will promote collaboration between
participating agencies in developing a health promoting community
in Te Kopuru by:
• Consultation with people of Te Kopuru
•
Local Research (identify existing projects)
•
Seek commitment to the project
•
Establish core community action groups
•
Create a shared vision
•
Identify and prioritise issues
•
Develop, implement and evaluate a plan of action
KCI recognises the need to know the role of other agencies, and
play a lead role as co-ordinating body to assist communities in the
Kaipara to prioritise and make the changes that will promote, improve
and protect their health.”
6. Intersectoral Activities
Because of the potential overlap of agencies working within the
Te Kopuru boundaries, regular intersectoral meetings will be a priority,
their aims being:
• To canvass the agencies to ascertain their current involvement
and future interest in collaborative approaches.
•
To consider accountability statements for such an intersectoral group
•
Eventual memoranda of understanding between the agencies participating
in the project.
•
Eventually to develop a working model for use in other deprived communities
within the Kaipara.
Special mention should be made of the intention of this group to
consult with and align itself with the Kaipara District Council,
Niho Taniwha model in engaging the Physical (Mana Whenua), Intellectual
(Mana Tupuna), and Spiritual (Mana Atua) aspects of this community
to make its own decisions. Our group will approach the Kaipara District
Council to make use of existing research to supplement our own information.
The first intersectoral hui will extend invitations to representatives
from the following groups, based on their current and future interest
for working within the Te Kopuru community.
| Kaipara Palliative Care |
Min Social Development (WINZ) |
Lions & Pakeke |
| Alcohol Accord |
Churches – Unified Ministry |
Plunket |
NH Public Health
- Health Protection
- Public Health Nursing
- Health Promotion
|
Health Promoting Schools
Smoke free
Community Injury Prevention
Sunsmart
Alcohol & Drug
Sexuality
Dental
etc
|
Housing NZ |
| Sport Northland |
Adards (Alzheimers group) |
C.Y.P.F.S |
| Industry Groups Forestry, Tourism |
Schools |
Police – (DARE) |
| Grey Power/Age Concern |
Ministry of Education |
Special Education Services |
| Team Solutions |
ACC Injury Prevention |
Roadsafe Northland |
| Ministry of Corrections |
Mental Hlth Svcs |
Heart Foundation |
| Care Plus (Home Help) |
District Nursing |
Diabetes Northland |
| Fire Service |
Telecom (Broadband) |
Kaipara District Council |
| Kaumatua & Kuia Oturei & Ripea Marae |
Mobile Ear Caravan |
Kohunga Reo |
| Maori Trust Board – Ngati Whatua |
Te Rununga Te Roroa |
Pharmacy |
| Kaipara District development Trust |
Rape Crisis |
Victim Support |
| Kaipara Abuse Prevention |
Homebuilders |
Maori Womens’ Welfare League |
7. Identifying Gaps in Services and Key Health
Needs
No meeting will occur without attention to this activity, but previous
intersectoral meetings have sometimes resulted in attendance of some
but not all agencies, often the most urgent of issues go un-represented.
Careful stocktaking of activities and the amount of resource spent
within Te Kopuru is required to allow more in-depth analysis of health
issues or gaps. In addition these services and perceived gaps need
to be matched with some population health outcomes gained from admission
and health service data, and disease based data within KCI’s
existing databases. In working with this community to prioritise
health promotion strategies we must have the best information available
to support their decisions. It is also expected within the identified
priorities a community decides to action, some priorities will be
outside of the scope of activity of a PHO but may be supported in
order to achieve some priorities which are more closely aligned.
8. Using Existing Community Assets
The founding proposal involving the Southern Rugby Club is one area
for assessing the level of further interest, as is either marae mentioned.
Schools are already involved as health promoting schools.
a. Example of a local Te Kopuru strategy:
The Southern Rugby Club provides an early focus for this project,
but like any sustainable project it must endure full consultation
with people making up its membership before any health initiatives
should commence. The lessons learned in Health Promoting Schools
in the Kaipara have been important in our planning this project so
far, as well as using a community development approach to gradually
develop trust, participation, and the initial focus on issues most
important to the club members.
A health promoting environment approach to such issues as:
(These issues are loosely prioritised as the community consultation
is still to occur)
1. Injury prevention Sports Injury prevention
* Mouthguard supply strategies
* Strain injuries - warm-up/down
2. Communicable Disease Meningitis and Hep B prevention
3. Alcohol and Drug Player Safety strategies
4. Smoking Uptake, avoidance and cessation
5. Food & Nutrition Weight Control
Each of these recognised health issues has people with expertise
and resources accessible to KCI within Northland. KCI's role will
be to facilitate the consultation process, allocate appropriate resources,
appoint or contract providers as necessary, establish linkages with
organisations such as ACC, and to access existing resources and expertise.
The above example can only be that until sufficient community consultation
can take place, and issues prioritised.
9. Planning and Resourcing
A health promotion programme plan is included. Specific Project
resource allocation can only be estimated until a thorough assessment
of stakeholders and issues in the Te Kopuru community can be made.
| Preparation of Agencies Distribution List |
$ 500.00 |
| Phone contact and mailout |
$ 500.00 |
| Inaugural Hui |
$ 1,000.00 |
| Research and Community Meetings |
$ 1,000.00 |
| Issues Prioritisation Meetings |
$ 1,000.00 |
| Strategy meetings |
$ 1,000.00 |
| Specific Project Resource Allocation |
$14,000.00 |
| Evaluation |
$ 925.00 |
| |
$19,425.00 |
a. Year One
All the activities listed above can be achieved in the first year.
Initial contact with community agencies and key community leaders
(potentially) is important, requires the use of local knowledge and
will encompass more than the key stakeholders. The key stakeholders
will emerge as meetings become more focused and issues begin to be
prioritised. Strategy meetings may require agencies previously not
engaged.
Specific project resource allocation may involve contracting a person
or agency to coordinate the project(s) or may be put toward facilitating
the commencement of programmes into the Te Kopuru community. For
example, if Hep B/Meningitis prevention is signalled as a priority
activity for this community, an awareness campaign tackled through
marae, schools, rugby club, radio, competitions can be resourced
appropriately from this fund.
Evaluation occurs at each stage, looking at effectiveness of consultation
processes, how differences in priorities are resolved, measures of
outputs put in place for each sub-project, use of existing agencies,
quality of collaboration, and final gathering of outcomes from a
range of sources, including interviews of Te Kopuru consumers, and
agency providers.
b. Continuation Beyond Year One Critical evaluation of the overall effectiveness of this project
will be reported on by KCI. Decisions to continue part or all projects
will follow this process. Other questions will need to be asked such
as:
•
Which of the successful aspects of this project can be implemented
elsewhere in the Kaipara?
•
Which aspects need to continue, and how much resource is required
for this to happen?
•
What were critical factors in achieving community “buy-in”?
|