Kaipara Care IncorporatedCo-ordinatoin through co-operationPhoto
 
 

Health Promotion

Kaipara Care Incorporated Health Promotion Proposal
May 2003

Te Kopuru – A Health Promoting Community

1. Profile Linking Te Kopuru With The Wider Northern Wairoa District.

Te Kopuru is situated 12 km from Dargaville on the Pouto Peninsula.

In its ‘hay day' Te Kopuru was the main centre for the Northern Wairoa. The surrounding area is rolling farm land, dairying predominates with beef and sheep and forestry further down the peninsula.

Dargaville has a population of some 5,000 but services the surrounding area which has an overall population of some 15,000. Within Northern Wairoa, there are primary Schools and both Dargaville and Ruawai have secondary schools. The shopping centre is good with a wide selection of shops.
Te Kopuru has the Southern Rugby and Squash Club, a bowling Club and there are numerous clubs in and around Dargaville, including a Golf Club.

There are two marae, Oturei and Ripia.
Approximately 5 km to the west of Te Kopuru is the Coast with broad stretches of sand where it is possible to travel for many miles along the beach. Surfing, surfcasting, shellfish gathering and netting are common. There are baches and picnic spots at Clarkes Bay and Kellys Bay which are on the Kaipara Harbour and provide safe bathing, fishing and sailing. The beautiful Kai Iwi lakes are about three quarters of an hours drive northwards and are excellent for sailing (good yacht club),
swimming, water skiing, picnicking and tramping. A little further northwards is the Waipoua Forest, famous for the great Kauri. Whangarei, on the east coast is about an hours drive, with the Bay of Islands only two hours from here.

The community is kind, caring and friendly and there are ample opportunities to become involved with the many clubs.

 

2. Te Kopuru Population and Deprivation Data

Te Kopuru stands out from all other towns in the Kaipara because of its population mix. It has the highest proportion of Maori of all towns in the Kaipara, and almost every street in Te Kopuru is Quintile 5 (Decile 9 & 10) or the most highly deprived. Of KCI’s enrolled population who are also known to be Quintile 5, Te Kopuru makes up 21%. The KCI register is almost 60% complete in geocodable addresses. This means that the known deprivation level of Te Kopuru will rise as the register becomes more complete. The high level of deprivation and the well known health inequalities of Maori, along with a geographically defined town, make Te Kopuru the leading focus for our health promotion project.

 

3. Initial Approach

An approach was received from senior men’s grade rugby coach, Allen Dennis, who felt that more could be done to encourage his team members, their families, and other grade teams at the (Te Kopuru) Southern Rugby Club to adopt healthier lifestyles, from their food and recreational choices, their health and safety on and off the field, their choices to smoke or be smoke-free, and their general levels of fitness. This approach led to an initial proposal framed for the KCI board to consider further, which focused on the Southern Rugby Club – The Health Promoting Rugby Club. The KCI board agreed that the concept had promise, and that a Te Kopuru base for early health promotion activity was well justified. The board nominated a Health Promotion sub-committee to develop this proposal further.

 

4. The KCI Health Promotion Sub-Committee

This sub-committee is made up of 3 KCI Board members, KCI Project Manager, Te Ha Health Promotion Co-ordinator, Health Promoting Schools Regional Co-ordinator (Public Health Promotion, Northland DHB), Public Health Nurse (Northland DHB). It met on three occasions. In establishing priorities and developing this proposal it became clear that the committee’s establishment, and ongoing activities were essential to the success of the Te Kopuru and any other health promotion projects which would be supported, implemented, evaluated and reviewed. It is the committee’s view that a stable group of members with governance and health promotion expertise should meet regularly (quarterly once projects are established) to oversee their development. The committee can make recommendations on expenditure to the full KCI board, and present progress reports as required. Choosing Te Kopuru as an initial focus should be viewed as strategically justifiable. Lessons learned here about consultation, leadership choices, successes and failures would be important when applying these principles to other projects.


5. Goal Statement

KCI Health Promotion Sub-Committee, developed this Health Promoting Community approach targeting a ‘health action group’ from two initial behaviour change proposals (a) a health promoting rugby club; (b) smoking cessation; and statistical data highlighting Te Kopuru as a high deprivation area (as outlined above), tabled at their first meeting.

The committee recognised the need to investigate what health promotion activities were already taking place in Te Kopuru and support a plan that fostered collaboration, cooperation and coordination
with the aim to develop planned activities that would build on what was already happening, linking agencies and projects in this community.

The following goal statement was developed to assist us to adhere to proven health promotion principles:

“To develop a model that will promote collaboration between participating agencies in developing a health promoting community in Te Kopuru by:

• Consultation with people of Te Kopuru
• Local Research (identify existing projects)
• Seek commitment to the project
• Establish core community action groups
• Create a shared vision
• Identify and prioritise issues
• Develop, implement and evaluate a plan of action

KCI recognises the need to know the role of other agencies, and play a lead role as co-ordinating body to assist communities in the Kaipara to prioritise and make the changes that will promote, improve and protect their health.”

6. Intersectoral Activities

Because of the potential overlap of agencies working within the Te Kopuru boundaries, regular intersectoral meetings will be a priority, their aims being:

• To canvass the agencies to ascertain their current involvement and future interest in collaborative approaches.
• To consider accountability statements for such an intersectoral group
• Eventual memoranda of understanding between the agencies participating in the project.
• Eventually to develop a working model for use in other deprived communities within the Kaipara.

Special mention should be made of the intention of this group to consult with and align itself with the Kaipara District Council, Niho Taniwha model in engaging the Physical (Mana Whenua), Intellectual (Mana Tupuna), and Spiritual (Mana Atua) aspects of this community to make its own decisions. Our group will approach the Kaipara District Council to make use of existing research to supplement our own information.

The first intersectoral hui will extend invitations to representatives from the following groups, based on their current and future interest for working within the Te Kopuru community.

Kaipara Palliative Care Min Social Development (WINZ) Lions & Pakeke
Alcohol Accord Churches – Unified Ministry Plunket
NH Public Health
- Health Protection
- Public Health Nursing
- Health Promotion
Health Promoting Schools
Smoke free
Community Injury Prevention
Sunsmart
Alcohol & Drug
Sexuality
Dental
etc
Housing NZ
Sport Northland Adards (Alzheimers group) C.Y.P.F.S
Industry Groups Forestry, Tourism Schools Police – (DARE)
Grey Power/Age Concern Ministry of Education Special Education Services
Team Solutions ACC Injury Prevention Roadsafe Northland
Ministry of Corrections Mental Hlth Svcs Heart Foundation
Care Plus (Home Help) District Nursing Diabetes Northland
Fire Service Telecom (Broadband) Kaipara District Council
Kaumatua & Kuia Oturei & Ripea Marae Mobile Ear Caravan Kohunga Reo
Maori Trust Board – Ngati Whatua Te Rununga Te Roroa Pharmacy
Kaipara District development Trust Rape Crisis Victim Support
Kaipara Abuse Prevention Homebuilders Maori Womens’ Welfare League

7. Identifying Gaps in Services and Key Health Needs

No meeting will occur without attention to this activity, but previous intersectoral meetings have sometimes resulted in attendance of some but not all agencies, often the most urgent of issues go un-represented. Careful stocktaking of activities and the amount of resource spent within Te Kopuru is required to allow more in-depth analysis of health issues or gaps. In addition these services and perceived gaps need to be matched with some population health outcomes gained from admission and health service data, and disease based data within KCI’s existing databases. In working with this community to prioritise health promotion strategies we must have the best information available to support their decisions. It is also expected within the identified priorities a community decides to action, some priorities will be outside of the scope of activity of a PHO but may be supported in order to achieve some priorities which are more closely aligned.

8. Using Existing Community Assets

The founding proposal involving the Southern Rugby Club is one area for assessing the level of further interest, as is either marae mentioned. Schools are already involved as health promoting schools.

a. Example of a local Te Kopuru strategy:

The Southern Rugby Club provides an early focus for this project, but like any sustainable project it must endure full consultation with people making up its membership before any health initiatives should commence. The lessons learned in Health Promoting Schools in the Kaipara have been important in our planning this project so far, as well as using a community development approach to gradually develop trust, participation, and the initial focus on issues most important to the club members.

A health promoting environment approach to such issues as:

(These issues are loosely prioritised as the community consultation is still to occur)

1. Injury prevention Sports Injury prevention
* Mouthguard supply strategies
* Strain injuries - warm-up/down
2. Communicable Disease Meningitis and Hep B prevention
3. Alcohol and Drug Player Safety strategies
4. Smoking Uptake, avoidance and cessation
5. Food & Nutrition Weight Control

Each of these recognised health issues has people with expertise and resources accessible to KCI within Northland. KCI's role will be to facilitate the consultation process, allocate appropriate resources, appoint or contract providers as necessary, establish linkages with organisations such as ACC, and to access existing resources and expertise.

The above example can only be that until sufficient community consultation can take place, and issues prioritised.

9. Planning and Resourcing

A health promotion programme plan is included. Specific Project resource allocation can only be estimated until a thorough assessment of stakeholders and issues in the Te Kopuru community can be made.

Preparation of Agencies Distribution List $ 500.00
Phone contact and mailout $ 500.00
Inaugural Hui $ 1,000.00
Research and Community Meetings $ 1,000.00
Issues Prioritisation Meetings $ 1,000.00
Strategy meetings $ 1,000.00
Specific Project Resource Allocation $14,000.00
Evaluation $ 925.00
  $19,425.00

a. Year One

All the activities listed above can be achieved in the first year. Initial contact with community agencies and key community leaders (potentially) is important, requires the use of local knowledge and will encompass more than the key stakeholders. The key stakeholders will emerge as meetings become more focused and issues begin to be prioritised. Strategy meetings may require agencies previously not engaged.

Specific project resource allocation may involve contracting a person or agency to coordinate the project(s) or may be put toward facilitating the commencement of programmes into the Te Kopuru community. For example, if Hep B/Meningitis prevention is signalled as a priority activity for this community, an awareness campaign tackled through marae, schools, rugby club, radio, competitions can be resourced appropriately from this fund.

Evaluation occurs at each stage, looking at effectiveness of consultation processes, how differences in priorities are resolved, measures of outputs put in place for each sub-project, use of existing agencies, quality of collaboration, and final gathering of outcomes from a range of sources, including interviews of Te Kopuru consumers, and agency providers.

b. Continuation Beyond Year One

Critical evaluation of the overall effectiveness of this project will be reported on by KCI. Decisions to continue part or all projects will follow this process. Other questions will need to be asked such as:
• Which of the successful aspects of this project can be implemented elsewhere in the Kaipara?
• Which aspects need to continue, and how much resource is required for this to happen?
• What were critical factors in achieving community “buy-in”?

 

  © 2006 KCI. Maintained by Computing Fitness Ltd