Immunistation Project
Introduction
The overall aim
of this project is to increase the immunisation coverage in the
Kaipara by facilitating a co-ordination and collaborative approach
between providers and the implementation of health promotional
strategies. By taking this approach, it is also expected the Tamariki
Ora - Well Child checks will be better facilitated and pursued.
Immunisation
coverage is a cause for concern in both developed and undeveloped
countries. It has been estimated that less than 60% of all children
in New Zealand, under the age of 2 years, are fully vaccinated.
| Immunisation is required against: |
diphtheria, |
| |
pertussis, |
| |
tetanus (DPT) |
| |
polio (OPV) |
| |
measles,mumps,rubella (MMR) |
| |
and hepatitis B (HepB). |
| |
(Hib) |
In addition,
some children are offered immunisations against tuberculosis (BBG)
and bacterial meningitis. Each of these diseases act in different
ways and contribute to the mortality and morbidity in children.
The Government's
commitment to immunisation is based on sound evidence as one of
the most cost effective means of preventing disease, and the benefits
outweigh any risks associated with the vaccine (MOH). However,
this position is not necessarily convincing to individuals for
whom immunisation has a immediate impact.
There have been
two New Zealand studies (White G. and Thompson A. 1992) and a North
Health Immunisation Coverage survey in 1996, which provide insights
into the low immunisation coverage. Both pieces of work examine
the barriers to immunisation and although small changes have been
noted between the 1992 and 1996 survey periods, they have remained
- in substance - the same.
White and Thompson
concluded that the socio cultural perspective to health beliefs
which are based on folk medicine, knowledge and experience preclude
the assumption that people make decisions based on knowledge from
a bio medical perspective based on science. In fact, they argue
mothers - the predominant respondents in the survey - tend to fall
into three categories, believers, non-believers and vacillators.
In addition, families may be described as stable or transient.
Planned strategies for immunisation uptake should take into consideration
the differences which lie between these categories.
Health professionals
should share the responsibility by ensuring mothers receive accurate
information on the pros and cons of vaccination, the prevalence
of the diseases in New Zealand and elsewhere and of the potential
consequences for children and family. The health professionals
need to co-ordinate their efforts by setting up recall systems
that generate reminders, providing accessible facilities and flexible
times for appointments and following best practice guidelines for
contradictions to vaccinations. Importantly health professional
must provide an environment that is warm, inviting and welcoming.
There are a small
number of non-believers in immunisation who act as society's watch
dogs. The few who choose not to vaccinate do not make a difference
to the immunity of populations when immunisation is high. It is
estimated that about 5% of the population make an informed choice
not to vaccinate.
Health professionals
must answer questions related to vaccination dangers truthfully
and in a non-biased manner. Distrust over vaccine schedules are
confusing and they frequently change. The change is usually due
to new information and improved technology making vaccines safer,
but distrusting people need to be convinced.
Co-ordination
of Immunisation in the Kaipara
The instigation
of the project came from the clinicians themselves - particularly
Te Ha o Te Oranga, who saw a need to co-ordinate immunisation and
well child services. At the end of 1999, a request for projects
was made by the Northland Health Medical Officer of Health, Dr
Jonathan Jarman, to assist a Public Health Medicine Registrar -
Dr Joy Robinson, meet the requirements toward gaining qualifications
in the field of Public Health.
This request
acted as a catalyst for a proposal to be put forward to Northland
Health as an opportunity for Dr Robinson to act as an extra resource
and participate in a co-ordination immunisation project. Dr Robinson
accepted the proposal as a project. The Operational Team approved
the project proposal.
This project
has also been driven by the clinicians. It is based on Public Health
and Health Promotion foundations, which sets it apart from the
other co-ordination disease based projects Kaipara Care has so
far instigated.
The process to
create a multi-disciplinary team was instigated. An initial key
stakeholder group was called. The process for identifying the stakeholders
was word of mouth from providers who knew of other provider groups
who would be interested in promoting a health focus to increase
immunisation coverage in the Kaipara. The KCI Project Manager met
with Dianne Lawson from Te Ha o Te Oranga and the Kaumatua and
Kuia to gain support for the project and to identify other stakeholders
in the Maori community.
The proposal
was submitted to Northland Health's Jonathan Jarman in December
1999 and the stakeholder meeting was held in March. From that a
multi-disciplinary team was formed.
The
Immunisation Team
| Maria Larsen |
(Representative Maori Women's Welfare League) |
| Coralie Zimmer |
(Immunisation Co-ordinator - Northland Health) |
| Raey Stainton |
(Te Ha o Te Oranga, Mobile Maori Nursing Service) |
| Dot Johnson |
(Plunket) |
| Isobel Ross |
(Practice Nurse, Dargaville Medical Centre) |
| Uncle Wati and Aunty Katie Tito |
(Kaumatua and Kuia) |
| Kaipara Care Incorporated |
(Project Manager) |
| Dr Joy Robinson |
(Northland Health) |
| Rachel Ashley |
(Consumer) |
| Mellaina Christie |
(Consumer) |
At the initial
meeting, feedback was sought from the providers on their perception
and experience around immunisation.
The team had
a very good working knowledge of immunisation and was helped considerably
by Coralie Zimmer, the Northland Health Immunisation Co-ordinator,
who brought both her expertise and experience with the "Immunisation
Outreach" project in Whangarei.
There was a general
perception and concern by the team, including the consumers, that
mothers were not receiving unbiased information about immunisation.
Other providers perceived a general willingness of parents to vaccinate
their children and recognised the socio cultural implications and
barriers as to why they did not. One provider, not on the team
but contributed later, estimated that 25% of the population actively
chose not to immunise their children. This is alarmingly high,
given the national estimate of those who actively do not vaccinate
their children is estimated to be 5%. It also begged some clarification
and validation on the nature of the information and advice parents
were receiving.
Immunisation
Multi-disciplinary Team and Team Co-ordinator
Rationale That
the activities required to support and monitor the immunisation
project are co-ordinated and communicated.
1. There is an
appointed project team and co-ordinator;
2. The co-ordinator is guided by the list of responsibilities below;
3. The co-ordinator is responsible to the Immunisation project team and
reports to the KCI project manager.
The
Multi-Disciplinary Team
- Meets 3 monthly
- Monitors the
progress of the project and makes changes
- Reports on
progress to the providers involved
- Reviews the
progress of the project on a n annual basis
Co-ordinators
Responsibility
- To arrange
project team meetings;
- To liaise
with KCI Data Administrator to obtain required data;
- Maintain records
of meetings and teaching activities;
- Ensure participation
in outcome measurements of all those involved;
- Initiate quality
management activities;
- Meet with
the KCI Project Manager as planned.
Needs
Assessment - The Kaipara Birth Statistics
Birth registration
statistics from July 1999 - June 00 for the Kaipara region (Statistics
New Zealand.) are separated into 9 domicile areas - Te Kopuru,
Kaipara Coastal, Maungaru, Dargaville, Maungaturoto, Ruawai, Rehia-Oneriri
and Mangawhai.
The births have
been sorted into three ethnic groups - Maori, Other (Non Maori)
and Maori/Other, which incorporate the babies, who are registered
with two ethnicities stated - one being Maori. (Table One)
The age of the mother is also included. (Table Two)
 |
 |
| Table One |
Table Two |
These figures
include all birth registrations in the whole of the Kaipara Region.
However, the only 0-5 year old target population available to us
for planning potential immunisation, are those held by DMC. The
DMC data does not hold ethnicity information.
Out of the total
population of 287 births the revised figure becomes 202 when the
geographical areas that can reasonably be extracted from the census
figures are subtracted i.e. Kaiwaka, Mangawhai, and Maungaturoto
as outside DMC catchment area. Of these, 120 were born at Dargaville,
and 68 at Whangarei. It is assumed the remaining 24 were home deliveries
or births in other regions.
The purpose of
these figures is to try and make a connection between the total
numbers of parents who actively choose not to vaccinate, and are
those who slip through the net for any reason other than actively
choosing not to vaccinate. This information on a population basis
may help inform the project and target those parents/guardians/whanau
who wish to have their children vaccinated but for some reason
are having difficulty in accessing the service.
It is estimated
there is a national average of 60% immunisation coverage in New
Zealand. Kaipara does a little better than that with:
0-6 months
69% being up to date
7-14 months 68% being up to date
15-24 months 64% being up to date
Allowing for
some small variations like the total population and other factors
related to choice of GP outside the area, there could be 808 vaccination
episodes over a three-year period.
Privacy
In order to meet
the Privacy Act requirements, the lead Maternity Carers, Plunket
and Te Ha o Te Oranga must inform the guardian/parent that immunisation
information is shared between them. This is to assist the guardian
or parent through the immunisation schedule, receive reminders
of when vaccinations are due and to receive information about immunisation
in general. For those who have actively chosen not to have their
children immunised this will ensure they are not receiving such
reminders.
See KCI Privacy Information Brochure
The
Health Promotion Perspective
|
"Health promotion makes a difference. Research and case
studies from around the world provide convincing evidence
that health promotion works. Health promotion strategies
can develop and change life styles, and have an impact on
the social, economic and environmental conditions that determine
health. Health promotion is a practical approach to achieving
greater equity in health."
|
|
Jakarta Declaration Health
Promotion
Into The 21st Century WHO
|
Health promotion theory and practice is based on the belief that
health is more than absence of disease or illness, but is a positive
concept emphasising social and personal resources as well as physical
capability. Thus, what it means to be healthy is as important as
what it means to be ill and it assesses the factors that determine
health.
There are three approaches to promoting health, all of which have
implications for the immunisation project.
1. The preventative medicine approach which promotes health by attempting
to prevent disease. This approach includes vaccination
2. Life style/individual approach that promotes health by trying to give
people the knowledge, attitudes and skills for healthier lifestyles.
. The socio-economic approach which addresses the wider socio-economic
determinants of health and creates healthy communities.
There is a cost on promotional material to this project that has
not been part of the previous projects. A large proportion of the
cost is "one off" and is attributable to the launch day. This day
is seen as being critical in a health promotional forum. There is
an ongoing cost related to the certificates and photos of babies
who have their vaccinations, and a colourful and inviting recall
letter.
Northland Health and Te Ha o Te Oranga have made a major contribution
to the organisation of the launch day and in the publishing of the
necessary recall letters. The scope of this project extends to children
from 0 to 6 years in the Kaipara Region where the GP database is
accessed
This project has developed from a health promotion approach and
the following table (on the next page) identifies the key areas of
activity in which the multi-disciplinary team has been involved:
Project Strategy and Process
| Project Outcomes |
Increase the overall immunisation coverage of
0 to 6 year olds in the Kaipara to 95% by 2004 |
| Objectives |
1. Identify the groups requiring immunisation
2. Increase immunisation levels
3. Improve quality of the immunisation service
4. Improve the co-ordination of immunisation between GP and other immunisation
providers. |
Objective One
Identify the groups requiring immunisation |
Main Activities
Needs assessment
- Use of existing DMC data
- Census figures
- Link with Plunket database.
|
Action
Completed
Completed
Part of referral check pathway
|
Objective Two
Increase immunisation levels |
Activities
Strategies to minimise missed opportunities
- Recall system
- User friendly letters
- Immunisation after 3pm
- Suitcase service
- Personalised immunisation certificate and photo· Marae
Clinics
- Mobile Plunket bus
- Launch of project
|
Evaluation
Review in December 2000 at a multi disciplinary meeting
using the data at hand.
October 10th 2000
|
Objective Three
Improve quality of the immunisation service. |
Activities
Consistent education messages between providers
- Provider on going education
|
Evaluation
Review in Dec 2000 at multi disciplinary team meeting.
Agreed on informational and educational material to be
used.
Northland Health Immunisation co ordinator
MoH Immunisation handbook
Manual
Written protocol manual
|
Objective Four
Improve the co-ordination of immunisation between DMC and other immunisation
providers. |
Activities
- Multi disciplinary team meetings
- Written referral forms
- Established care pathways
- Immunisation Manual
Reporting Processes
|
Evaluation
Review in Dec 2000
Completed review Dec 2000
Completed Oct 2000 then review as above
Completed Oct 2000 then as above
Review in Dec 2000
|
| Indicators to be used
to measure outcomes |
Process |
Time Line |
- Increase identification of children requiring immunisation
- Provider net working
- Numbers using suitcase clinics/Marae clinics
- Number of missed opportunities.
- Educational information
- Vaccine admin
- Consumer satisfaction
Regulatory Requirements
Approved Vaccinators
Cold Chain
Reporting Reactions
|
Use of the data base DMC and Plunket
Numbers of successful recalls
Numbers of referrals between providers
Team meetings
Data base
Audit of medical notes
Audit information distributed
Audit Northland
Immunisation co-ordinator
Telephone Survey
Process
Professional and provider responsibilities
Audit
Audit medical notes
|
December 2000 multi disciplinary meeting to report on data
available and to review the effectiveness and practicability
of the project processes
Evaluation
To be finalised Dec 2000
|
|
Budget
$2,500.00
|
Activities
Launch day
T shirts
Prizes
Epi Centre
Other activities
Production and cost of recall letters magnets and certificates/photos
|
In the 2000 to 2001 budget
|
Management
of the Immunisation Resources and Database
The Letters of Invitation to Parents and
Guardians
The letters of
invitation are sent by the Data Administrator who collects the
information required from the DMC database.
The lead maternity
providers will inform the mothers of the Immunisation Project and
give the mothers the immunisation packs to be supplied by IMAX
on discharge. The local lead maternity providers will access the
mothers of babies born in Whangarei about the Kaipara project.
Privacy
The database
is held at DMC as part of their every day business with an extension
to the data needed for monitoring the outcomes of the project.
DMC's own privacy procedures includes the matter of sharing information
between providers as is necessary, as well as with KCI for monitoring
purposes.
The brochure
containing KCI privacy policy will be sent out with the first letters
of invitation.
The Photos and Certificates
DMC Administration
will responsible for taking the photo when asked by a practice
nurse. A photo is printed and inserted onto the form letter with
the six participating health provider's logos and given to the
child's parent or guardian. A copy of the photo is identified with
the child's NHI number and stored on disc until the next vaccination
and another photo is taken and stored. Eventually the child will
have 4 photos stored at the completion of the vaccination schedule.
The photos are then transported onto the certificate held on the
word doc. for this purpose. The child's name entered on the certificate
and then printed and given to the parent or guardian. T he photos
on the disc are then wiped.
Providers undertaking
suitcase vaccinations will be provided with disposable cameras.
Careful labeling of the photo number along with the name of the
child will be required. Parents or caregivers will have to be informed
the photo will either be delivered by post or by their provider.
Two copies of the photos will be required and one copy held at
DMC for the certificate when immunisation schedule for the child
is completed and the photos can be attached to the certificate.
Data Collection
The care pathway
sends all information to DMC who in turn refers patients as required.
The assigned practice nurse enters all data as it is received.
The DMC Data Administrator collects the data required to post out
invitations and "we are late" letters on a monthly basis. The monitoring
and analysis of outcomes will be initially three monthly and will
be the responsibility of the KCI Data Administrator. This information
is supplied to the immunisation team and any issue addressed and
changes made to the project as necessary.
Manual
All provider
organisations of immunisation will have a manual. It is the Immunisation
teams responsibility to review and update manual. KCI assist in
this activity with formatting and any changes.
Immunisation
Certificate/Photo Letter

|